Wednesday, September 08, 2004
Flash Report!


Bureau Stands By 3.5 Increase

SAN FRANCISCO- Based on the June 2004 actuarial data, the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau Governing Committee has voted to stand pat on its recommended pure premium rate increase of 3.5 percent.

The increase is based on benefits increases enacted by AB 749, but Bureau execs reminded the members of its Committee – made up of mostly out-of-state carriers -- that but for the workers’ comp reform legislation passed in fall 2003 and early spring 2004, employers would have been looking at a recommended 50 percent increase in January 2005 rates.

“The good news is our projections are holding,” says Dave Bellusci, the Bureau’s senior actuary.

According to Bureau actuaries, the Department of Insurance, using the same methodology it used to determine the advisory pure premium rate for July policies, came up with a three tenths percent increase in rates from AB 749. The Department has not calculated its January rate recommendation yet and says it will not do so until after the hearing next week.

The decision not to change the recommendation left some members, who had hoped for a greater reduction from the provisions of SB 899, fuming.

“You’ve been trying to get employer control of medical care for years. If it was so important it must mean something. We should see a 10 percent decrease in rates at least,” says Tom Rankin, retired president of the California Labor Federation.

The rates are not the fault of the Bureau. It is the legislature who failed in its final hours to clean up the reform bills and an administrative bureaucracy that can’t seem to timely develop a medical fee schedule. And let’s not fail to remember that it is the lawyers, in the end, who so successfully assist the system in driving up the costs.

~30~


Flash Reports cover time sensitive stories and other items of interest. Go to our home page at www.wcexec.com to order the print version of The Workers' Comp Executive.

Legal Notice:
The editors have made efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information published in each issue. Opinions on financial, legal or other matters are those of the editors and others; professional counsel should be consulted before any action or decision based upon this material is taken.

The material herein is copyright 2004 Providence Publications, LLC. All Rights reserved. This document may be forwarded, copied or distributed subject to the following conditions: (1) The full report including text, graphics and links must be copied without modification and all pages must be included; (2) All copies must contain Providence Publications copyright notice; (3) This document may not be distributed for profit.